How will we meet the demand for pediatric specialty care?


By Christopher G. Dawes
President, Chief Executive Officer of Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford and Stanford Medicine Children’s Health

For all the promises made in the debate over expanding access to health insurance in the U.S., one important aspect has gone largely unnoticed: insurance aside, America simply does not have enough pediatric specialists and subspecialists to care for the growing number of children with serious diseases and chronic conditions. This critical shortage poses not just a dilemma for local and national health care organizations, but it requires completely new ways of thinking.

We certainly know it’s a problem here in California. More than one million California children under 17 – one in 10 kids – have special health care needs. This includes chronic, complex and rare conditions, including those once considered life threatening. Given the Bay Area’s 1.6 million children, an estimated 160,000 may need expert medical attention requiring a pediatric specialist.

This sizable population creates demand for specialists equipped with the latest in diagnosis and treatment options. Every day at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, I see how highly trained specialists and the necessary teams of nurses, therapists, social workers and child life support staff make a difference for these children and their families.

But with four times as many adults as children in the U.S, the majority of our nation’s health and medical resources are focused on adults. There are too few centers that have the clinical and family support capability in children’s health care needs and too few specialists entering such fields as pediatric neurology, pediatric gastroenterology, pediatric surgery and developmental-behavioral medicine.

What accounts for the scarcity? Firstly, it’s the time and expense of additional training for specialists and subspecialists. After four years of medical school, their education continues with three years of pediatric residency and another three years’ minimum of subspecialty training. Federal funds available to support this training under the Children’s Hospitals Graduate Medical Education Program have declined substantially since 2010. Specialists also face stiff competition for a limited number of training programs.

And despite their expensive, extended education, pediatric specialists struggle to achieve income parity. The reimbursement differential between adult and pediatric specialists is acute. For instance, in California, MediCal pays a pediatrician only an average of 54 percent of Medicare reimbursement rates for comparable services provided to adults. This shortfall in funding places pressure on pediatric subspecialty compensation and further hinders growth in these professions.

A shortage of specialists can mean a family waits weeks or months for an appointment, or must travel long distances to see a specialist. This may delay treatment, increase emergency room visits and add to family stress and expense. In fact, more than a third of California families with children who face special health care needs find it difficult to access the care they need.

Addressing this challenge demands a broad, concerted effort and new approaches to health care delivery. One way to attack the problem is to expand access to pediatric specialty care. That’s why, over the next 12 months, Stanford Medicine Children’s Health is establishing new specialty service centers in Los Gatos, Fremont and Sunnyvale. Fremont and Sunnyvale will be joining our already established pediatric specialty centers at California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco; John Muir Health in Walnut Creek; and in Emeryville, Palo Alto and Capitola. Our new Los Gatos facility has just opened at 14601 South Bascom Ave. after having outgrown its current Los Gatos location due to its success.

Specialty centers have benefits beyond providing more treatment options to patients. Importantly, they can attract specialists who want to serve a broad and diverse population. They also provide more options for training, which ensures the next generation of pediatric specialists – who often prefer to train at an academic medical center and children’s hospital like ours — with the highest quality medical experience.

Health care organizations must also examine other ways to bring care closer to patients. This expanded access can be accomplished by sending physicians on the road, as we have done with our liver transplant program for example, or by deploying technology more rapidly. We’ve tapped video technology to connect specialists and patients in an approach we call telehealth, offering easier access to specialists and decreasing burdens on families who must travel for care. Specialists can even connect with patients through home health monitoring. An example is our pilot project using Apple’s HealthKit to enable endocrinologists to remotely monitor blood sugar levels among children with Type 1 diabetes.

It’s incumbent upon leading health care organizations, along with state and federal health programs, to address the shortage of pediatric specialists and subspecialists. We must develop new approaches to providing access to high-quality, specialized care for kids in need. Together, we can create a model that reduces costs, improves outcomes, increases access, and creates a better patient experience.

Christopher G. Dawes, former chair of the Board of Trustees for the National Association of Children’s Hospitals and Related Institutions and also the National Association of Children’s Hospitals, serves on the board of the California Children’s Hospital Association. In addition, Dawes is also a board member of the California Hospital Association and their executive committee; the Santa Clara Family Health Plan; and the Silicon Valley Leadership Group.


Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)